Financial Transaction Classification Using Supervised Learning for Banking Risk Assessment

Authors

  • Rajiv Harish Patel Solanki Department of Computer Application and Science, Swami Vivekananda Institute of Modern Science, Kolkata, Under MAKAUT & AICTE, West Bengal, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15680/IJRCSM.2017.0103001

Keywords:

Financial transaction classification, supervised learning, banking risk assessment, machine learning, fraud detection, random forest, gradient boosting, class imbalance, financial security

Abstract

The increasing volume and complexity of financial transactions have created significant challenges for banks in identifying fraudulent activities, assessing financial risks, and ensuring regulatory compliance. Traditional rule-based transaction monitoring systems often struggle to recognize sophisticated fraud patterns and adapt to evolving financial crime techniques. This study examines the application of supervised machine learning techniques for financial transaction classification to improve banking risk assessment. The proposed approach focuses on classifying financial transactions into predefined categories, such as legitimate and suspicious transactions, using historical transaction records and labeled datasets. Relevant features, including transaction amount, transaction frequency, account activity, transaction type, geographical information, and customer behavioral patterns, are considered for model development. Supervised learning algorithms, including logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and gradient boosting, are discussed as potential classification methods. Model performance can be evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Particular attention is given to class imbalance, data privacy, model interpretability, and false-positive reduction. The study proposes a systematic framework for integrating machine learning into banking risk management systems. By enabling faster identification of suspicious transactions and supporting data-driven decision-making, supervised learning can strengthen fraud detection capabilities, improve operational efficiency, and enhance financial security. The findings are expected to provide a foundation for developing reliable, scalable, and responsible transaction classification systems

References

1. Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical Science, 17(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1042727940

2. Chan, P. K., Fan, W., Prodromidis, A. L., & Stolfo, S. J. (1999). Distributed data mining in credit card fraud detection. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(6), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.809570

3. Dorronsoro, J. R., Ginel, F., Sánchez, C., & Cruz, C. S. (1997). Neural fraud detection in credit card operations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 8(4), 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.595879

4. Ghosh, S., & Reilly, D. L. (1994). Credit card fraud detection with a neural-network. In Proceedings of the 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 621–630). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1994.323314

5. Hand, D. J., & Henley, W. E. (1997). Statistical classification methods in consumer credit scoring: A review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 160(3), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.1997.00078.x

6. Ngai, E. W. T., Hu, Y., Wong, Y. H., Chen, Y., & Sun, X. (2011). The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.006

7. Phua, C., Lee, V., Smith, K., & Gayler, R. (2010). A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection research. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.6119

8. Quah, J. T. S., & Sriganesh, M. (2008). Real-time credit card fraud detection using computational intelligence. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 1721–1732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.093

9. Sahin, Y., & Duman, E. (2011). Detecting credit card fraud by decision trees and support vector machines. In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.

10. Srivastava, A., Kundu, A., Sural, S., & Majumdar, A. K. (2008). Credit card fraud detection using hidden Markov model. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 5(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2007.70228

11. West, J., & Bhattacharya, M. (2016). Intelligent financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review. Computers & Security, 57, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.005

12. Whitrow, C., Hand, D. J., Juszczak, P., Weston, D., & Adams, N. M. (2009). Transaction aggregation as a strategy for credit card fraud detection. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 18, 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-008-0116-z

13. Dal Pozzolo, A., Caelen, O., Le Borgne, Y.-A., Waterschoot, S., & Bontempi, G. (2014). Learned lessons in credit card fraud detection from a practitioner perspective. In Expert Systems with Applications.

14. Aleskerov, E., Freisleben, B., & Rao, B. (1997). CARDWATCH: A neural network based database mining system for credit card fraud detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (pp. 220–226). IEEE.

15. West, D. (2000). Neural network credit scoring models. Computers & Operations Research, 27(11–12), 1131–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00149-5

Downloads

Published

2017-11-03