Jacksonian democracy, lead by , was a political movement that emphasized the needs of the common man rather than the elite and educated favored by the Jeffersonian style of government.
It has confounded some scholars that so much of this ferment eventually coalesced behind Andrew Jackson—a one-time land speculator, opponent of debtor relief, and fervent wartime nationalist. By the 1820s, however, Jackson’s personal business experiences had long since altered his opinions about speculation and paper money, leaving him eternally suspicious of the credit system in general and banks in particular. His career as an Indian fighter and conqueror of the British made him a popular hero, especially among land-hungry settlers. His enthusiasm for nationalist programs had diminished after 1815, as foreign threats receded and economic difficulties multiplied. Above all, Jackson, with his own hardscrabble origins, epitomized contempt for the old republican elitism, with its hierarchical deference and its wariness of popular democracy.
Free Andrew Jackson Essays and PapersFree Andrew Jackson papers, essays, and research papersEssay about Andrew Jackson Dbq the Democratic Feb 2013 Perhaps he was democratic in some ways and undemocratic in others Andrew Jackson was a supporter in Indian removal However, he alsoHow Democratic was Andrew Jackson? Essay - 1034 Sep 2013 Free Essay: Though Jackson was democratic by expanding voting rights, it was a selfish, undemocratic claim because Jackson wanted toAndrew Jackson s Shifting Legacy | The Gilder Of all presidential reputations, Andrew Jackson s is perhaps the most difficult to summarize or explain Most Americans recognize his name, though mostEssay on Andrew Jackson Was Not a Democrat - 542 Dec 2012 Although Jackson used undemocratic actions to pursue his objectives, Essay How Democratic was Andrew Jackson? Old Hickory neverThe reality of Andrew Jackson essaysAndrew Jackson, who was believed to be a man of dignity and self respect, was in addition, incredibly undemocratic Jackson s followers presented him as the
Another angle is that Jacksonianism can be seen as a walking contradiction with the existence of slavery and subjugation of minorities in an age of white supremacy defying any "democratic" nature....
Andrew Jackson s Shifting Legacy | The Gilder Of all presidential reputations, Andrew Jackson s is perhaps the most difficult to summarize or explain Most Americans recognize his name, though mostEssay on Andrew Jackson Was Not a Democrat - 542 Dec 2012 Although Jackson used undemocratic actions to pursue his objectives, Essay How Democratic was Andrew Jackson? Old Hickory neverFree Andrew Jackson Essays and PapersFree Andrew Jackson papers, essays, and research papersHow Democratic was Andrew Jackson? Essay - 1034 Sep 2013 Free Essay: Though Jackson was democratic by expanding voting rights, it was a selfish, undemocratic claim because Jackson wanted toEssay about Andrew Jackson Dbq the Democratic Feb 2013 Perhaps he was democratic in some ways and undemocratic in others Andrew Jackson was a supporter in Indian removal However, he also
The triumph of democracy was the dominant theme of American life in the first half of the 19th century. Jacksonian democracy was far from perfect: Most women and African-Americans couldn’t vote. But the principle that political power in America rested with ordinary people became firmly entrenched.
Jackson’s foremost achievement was securing the triumph of democracy as the touchstone of American politics. Jackson was born a subject of the British empire; he grew to adulthood in a republic governed by elites who expected and received deference from the mass of the American people. In most states, the right to vote was confined to white men who owned property and had been long in residence; even among white males, voters were often a small minority.
This paper will focus primarily on three essays: The Social Contract by John Locke, Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau, and The Democratic Age by Fareed Zakaria.
However, with the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828, a new form of democracy, differentiating in multiply ways to the Jeffersonian America, engulfed the American political and social scene....
A period of nearly 30 years are associated with the Presidency of Jefferson, his successors and his ‘democracy’ from 1801 until Andrew Jackson’s election in 1828.
None of this, however, should be a source of self-satisfaction to modern Americans. Although the Jacksonian Democracy died in the 1850s, it left a powerful legacy, entwining egalitarian aspirations and class justice with the presumptions of white supremacy. Over the decades after the Civil War, that legacy remained a bulwark of a new Democratic party, allying debt-ridden farmers and immigrant workers with the Solid South. The Second of the 1950s and 1960s forced Democrats to reckon with the party’s past—only to see party schismatics and Republicans pick up the theme. And at the close of the twentieth century, the tragic mix of egalitarianism and racial prejudice so central to the Jacksonian Democracy still infected American politics, poisoning some of its best impulses with some of its worst.
There was a grim, ironic justice to the Jacksonians’ fate. Having tapped into the disaffection of the 1820s and 1830s and molded it into an effective national party, they advanced the democratization of American politics. By denouncing the moneyed aristocracy and proclaiming the common man, they also helped politicize American life, broadening electoral participation to include an overwhelming majority of the electorate. Yet this very politicization would ultimately prove the Jacksonian Democracy’s undoing. Once the slavery issue entered the concerns of even a small portion of the electorate, it proved impossible to remove without trampling on some of the very egalitarian principles the Jacksonians were pledged to uphold.
It would take until the 1850s before these contradictions fully unraveled the Jacksonian coalition. But as early as the mid-1840s, during the debates over annexation, the Mexican War, and the , sectional cleavages had grown ominous. The presidential candidacy of Martin Van Buren on the Free-Soil ticket in 1848—a protest against growing southern power within the Democracy—amply symbolized northern Democratic alienation. Southern slaveholder Democrats, for their part, began to wonder if anything short of positive federal protection for slavery would spell doom for their class—and the white man’s republic. In the middle remained a battered Jacksonian mainstream, ever hopeful that by raising the old issues, avoiding slavery, and resorting to the language of popular sovereignty, the party and the nation might be held together. Led by men like , these mainstream compromisers held sway into the mid-1850s, but at the cost of constant appeasement of southern concerns, further exacerbating sectional turmoil. Jacksonian Democracy was buried at , but it had died many years earlier.